Through the initiative of the Global Network of Civil Society
Organizations on Disaster Reduction (GNDR), a group of CSOs in Cameroon is working
with local communities to assess their level of vulnerability, capacity, on-going
actions, and everyday barriers to mitigating the impact of disaster risk (DR). A
process entitled Action, Reflection and Learning, or Action on the Frontline (AFL)
is being used to engage community members in capturing multi-hazards, multi-scale
risk types; low intensity, high frequency (everyday) risk and high intensity low
frequency risks in communities. Indigenous/local knowledge and local coping
strategies are assessed in the process, with clear indications on how people
living in risk (especially landslides and seasonal floods) prone areas are
coping with risk impacts.
The AFL process combines traditional or local knowledge with the
scientific approach to better sort out ways of addressing disaster risk
reduction (DRR) at the frontline. Through an interactive scooping and learning
process, community members become aware of common risks around them, by
starting to engage through a set of simple questions, either as individuals or during
focused group discussions that include youths, women, the elderly and the
disabled, about risk types in their communities. This includes asking community
members exposed to multiple risk types to list most important threats (risks) that
affect them. The identified risk types are then ranked. For each type,
consequences are listed. A discussion is then made of what local or scientific
approaches are used to mitigate the risk impacts.
The outcome of a number of individual conversations or focused
group discussions are mapped and analyzed, then results are presented to the
community members during a reflection session. Other approaches such as
community participatory mapping are included in the process in order, not only to
prick spatial thinking in the community members, but also to better understand
their terrain. These reflection sessions also provide unique opportunities for
members to exchange rich local knowledge and learn from one another on coping
strategies. Designing and agreeing on common actions to overcome identified
barriers in advancing DRR in the communities is also part of the process with
input from facilitators (community based organizations).
A case study in Limbe (southwest Cameroon) led to community
members embedding regular reflections on the situation of risks in their
community during meeting sessions which were regularly held but without focusing
on DRR issues. With the inclusion of DRR in their weekly/monthly meetings,
members of the community became more aware of the risks common in their community,
were better able to utilize shared local
knowledge and coping strategies in mitigating them, and thus in contributing to
building a resilient community in which members have better hopes of living safely
together. This activity is contributing towards understanding disaster risks better.
Common community initiatives like building sand-bag embankments, have been
developed that are aimed at reducing risk impacts.
Limbe lies on the southwest flank of the still active Mt
Cameroon volcano, so indigenous populations living around the mountain have strengthened
their use of indigenous/local knowledge (e.g., distinctive behavioral patterns of
domestic animals, movement of wild animals and birds from one part of the
volcano to another, changes in spring water temperature…) to predict impending eruptions. This knowledge compliment
scientific approach through the use of seismograms in monitoring the seismic
activity of the mountain.
The big challenge in most of these communities is how to
effectively mobilize necessary support from corporate, NGOs and local
government in order to drive needed change in their communities, and also in
which way existing local and scientific knowledge can be effectively combined
to address multiple risks affecting their community. Most of these issues are underlying
risk drivers like economics, environmental and societal issues. Addressing poverty,
week environmental management and bad governance, need for individual change,
and adapting to current realities, are some areas that require focusing on more.
No comments:
Post a Comment